14th Finance
Commission Red "Regarding grants-in-aid the report states the following:
-
""A total revenue deficit grant of Rs. 194821 crore is recommended
during the award period for 11 states"".
-
""There is a case for transfer from union government to states to
augment expenditure in specific sectors...however, past experience shows that
achieving this through the mechanism of FC grants may not be
appropriate.""
-
Its recommends use of the increased fiscal space to meet high base expenditures
for police & general administration.
-
it is desisted from recommending specific purpose grants for public services
and has suggested separate institutional arrangement for this purpose.
However,
the commission also recommends distribution of grants to states in two parts
(basic &performance).
These
statements seem contradictory as on one hand only revenue deficit grant is
proposed to be allotted (only to 11 states), while on the other hand it is also
recommending basic & performance grants based on criteria of population and
area size of the state.
The commission ensures the states with
resources such as EEZ or minerals etc..get appropriate share from the royalty/
taxes collected by central govt.. Hence more grant to those 11 states..j&k,
himachal Pradesh, etc got this mostly.. There always is a balancing act..in a
federal structure..like ours. If we go by performance some states may be
deprived of the funds to ensure proper governance..
The union wants to use both performance
on fiscal deficit as well as traditional way of control in disbursing the
funds. But many times mere controls on FD does not yield results as it based on
the states active participation in bringing down many politest policies. Hence
not inclined to do so. How ever I order to get all the states in nation
building the union govt uses such mixed criteria.
So
sir can we say that fc is recommending revenue deficit grant and basic and
performance grants to urban local bodies in place of otherwise grants-in-aid.

No comments:
Post a Comment