Fast tracks have been made only to clear the
pendency however pendency drives may not necessarily only mean fast track court
Sir along with horizontal extension (more
courts) , vertical extension ( efficient and effective courts) could also
reduce pendency. What could be possible hurdles in importing efficiency of
courts in Indian context? Sir
Judicial reforms have always been sought after. However
the term 'fast track court' itself is a paradox Justice cannot be 'targeted' One
of the largest litigant in our country is the government 'Simpler laws' can be
one of a solution
sir is there any difference between fast
track courts n pendency drives? or one the mechanism of the other
both largely mean the same
sir
there is an argument that many vacancies for judges has not been filled ? is it
true sir?
filling up of judges is also an issue do we want all
judge seats filled or we want only good judges in the seats?
Linking
reduction of pendency with performance of judges. Could it help? Like KPI- key
performance indicator
We discussed the difficulty in getting a decent
performance indicator for a 'bureacrat' having one for a judge is atleast 10
times more difficult
so
sir, there isn't any defined domain with respect to which they are constituted.
because pendency reduction drives have been organized for cases related to marginalized
communities ...while the fast track courts have been often set up for issues
related to women
fast track courts have been set up for various
reasons
fast track courts are clear cut they are made with
the fund from the eleventh finance commission funds lot of details available in
the net. courts for pendency drives - this includes fast track courts
Sir....
there is a argument that "Justice hurried is justice buried " and
"Justice delayed is justice denied " .... how do actually indian judiciary
manage this catch 22 situation wrt to fast track courts?
fast track courts do the following
1, more courts
2, more judges - retired ones, ad hoc ones
3, deal with particular type of cases - so efficient
Fast Tract Courts: These are like any other courts.
In a court due to high number of cases normally a case is adjourned with huge
gaps. Like the hearing in a case comes once in a month. These ftc courts are formed
and less number of sensitive cases are assigned to them. So short adjournments
make the trial fast. All the procedures are adopted and justice is not hurried.
But also no delayed.
There a difference between under trials and ftc
courts. Issue of under trails is because of charges getting of cases and
sureties. Any person after 90 days can get himself released on bail if
chargesheet is not laid except in few laws. Thats a different scenario. Ftc has
nothing to do with under trials. This is basically for a speedy trial. Cases
are again divided in to simple cases and session cases. Session cases are like
murder. Ftc basically deals with session cases.
Sir...
in FTC both non-cognisable and Cognisable cases are taken up ?
No, Non cognizable cases are done in lower
level.courts
sir,
so for undertrials some other court is set up? fast track - for speedy justice
and sensitive cases; undertrials courts are different from normal courts?
There is nothing like under trail courts. All courts
look after them
Fast track courts - one more link: http://pib.nic.in/feature/feyr2001/fmay2001/f010520012.html
No comments:
Post a Comment