Activist Priya Pillai

What was the necessity of a worker associated with an NGO to present a report in front of British Parliament? Wasn't that an offense considering the national security? Can we justify the action of IB on offloading her?

This was asked regarding a recent incident where activist Priya Pillai was stopped from going abroad! In this forest rights and tribal rights activist Priya Pillai (pp), wanted to submit a testimony in the European parliament.

Those people's ( EU ) plans were, taking it as a strong base and impose economic sanctions telling that India is a country violating tribal rights and their forest rights!

Sanction means its a financial boycott! Since they enjoy the European countries enjoy hegemony over many countries they can influence many countries not to continue economic relations with us.

Bcoz of this our economy will be going down!

There are arguments like being the largest democracy, India should have broad mindedness in accepting the criticisms of such kind.. in that sense offloading an activist having all legal documents can be justified?

That was the argument put by civil societies

European parliament is a biased forum where it can decide exparte and no chance will be given to India to defend through our view! So its a conspiracy to bring down India's economic rate by other countries.And these sorts of sanctions are basically used against China, North Korea, etc. also to bring down their growth rate.

Priya Pillai like any other activist can put forth her views, but not by joining with other countries.

You have right to show your discontent through ONLY constitutional means.
Another thing is no country should be given or poke their nose by legislating extraterritorial laws! 
It should not be the cup of tea for the European parliament to moral police our country when they have lots of baggage in their countries!

these activists are working for tribal rights and when our govt is not willing to compromise on its development agenda is her stand not justified in view of tribal rights??

It's a conspiracy by other countries to bring down countries economic rate. For this if they have the testimony of Priya Pillai they can substantiate telling Indian activist itself, given us the evidence! So only IB stopped them. In short to end economic wars.Gov't has all powers if it feels its national security is compromised. And national security is not only law and order . It's a very wide term has an exhaustive meaning. In fact economic security is also national security!

Activists seem to bigger threat and challenge to our country after naxlites and unstable neighbors!

So now, what's important for you people is,
1) What was that forum by countries about and what its functions
2) Under what authority (there is a special provision under which) IB has stopped her from going abroad.
3) What may be the consequences if she would have presented her report! 
4) Is it appropriate for countries to poke their nose into the internal affairs of a sovereign country like India? 
5) How mocking these extraterritorial laws are?

Had she used some legitimate source of protesting like lobbying and Dharma....there were some chances of her grievances to be sorted by the government... she might've faultered at that end... but such extreme steps like issuing a 'look out circular' by the IB... isn't that an extreme step?

Anybody in this country can protest and show their discontent only through constitutional means even if the heaven is going to fall! 
Even in interview your stand must be this only.

Stoping her from expressing her views indirectly are against her fundamental rights....

If nation's security is at stake, no matter what you are in a position to protect yourselves. 
If govt wants they can even book anybody under various laws. 
Mistakes may be forgiven, not blunders! 
When you know your country's development is at stake its not wise enough to go to a world forum!Nobody is stopping her! 
Let her express her anguish within this 29 states and 7 union territories. Not outside the country!

Especially when it is being used as a covert agenda against the country's economic development.

if pp report was right why don't government rectify itself & show the world that tribal rights are not declained here ??

Its a tug of war between development vs tribal and their forest rights! 
There are many examples for this in India.