Can the state indulge
in trading of protected species who are on the brink of extinction or are
threatened?
As for India, I heard
that government stockpiles tonnes of sandalwood and bares people from doing the
same? Same goes for China too- their Giant Pandas are vulnerable to extinction?
(Of late in their panda diplomacy- they've started charging huge amounts of sum
while transferring their pandas to zoos of other countries)
Is sandalwood
mentioned as threatened or endangered under wildlife act 1972?
Surely
sandal wood will be listed in wildlife act
But there
are 6 categories.
From least
endangered to extinct. The category varies. So in which category it comes under
matters a lot.
I don't
think so sandalwood would be in critically endangered category. If so it’s not
logical for the Government to trade it for monetary gains.
If it’s not
an endangered variety, Government can trade it subjected to replaceable or
sustainable limits. Not a mindless trading.
Harvest is totally monopolized by the forest department?
Because it’s a variety listed under wildlife act. So it’s
restricted for the common man. It’s monopolized for the welfare of wildlife
only. For that matter no trading is allowed for a common man on any wildlife.
Govt enjoys and should enjoy the monopoly.
Access to wildlife is restricted to a common man, because this
wildlife is the nerves of the earth. So government know when to trade and when
do not. But if a proper economy based on supply and demand by a common man is
allowed then there are chances that those resources are exploited beyond a
reasonable limit thereby cresting grave threats to the life on earth.
Provided that explicitly mentioned in the statue that it’s tradable
by the govt. Or else a strict NO.
No comments:
Post a Comment